linux-kernel - Re: Regular ext4 error warning with HD in USB dock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <4D19BEF1.9010708@shiftmail.org>
Date:	Tue, 28 Dec 2010 11:41:53 +0100
From:	torn5 <torn5@...ftmail.org>
To:	Ted Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Con Kolivas <kernel@...ivas.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
	linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Regular ext4 error warning with HD in USB dock

On 12/28/2010 03:53 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 09:53:45AM +1100, Con Kolivas wrote:
>    
>> Since I moved my internal HD into a USB dock externally and mount the ext4
>> filesystem on it, I regularly get the following errors after it has been
>> mounted for a while (see timecode). It doesn't seem to matter which recent
>> kernel I use.
>>
>> [1048401.773270] EXT4-fs (sde8): mounted filesystem with writeback data mode.
>> Opts: (null)
>> [1048702.736011] EXT4-fs (sde8): error count: 3
>> [1048702.736016] EXT4-fs (sde8): initial error at 1289053677:
>> ext4_journal_start_sb:251
>> [1048702.736018] EXT4-fs (sde8): last error at 1289080948: ext4_put_super:719
>>      
> That's actually not an error.  It's a report which is generated every
> 24 hours, indicating that there has been 3 errors since the last time
> the error count has been cleared, with the first error taking place at
> Sat Nov 6 10:27:57 2010 (US/Eastern) in the function
> ext4_journal_start_sb(), at line 251, and the most recent error taking
> place at Sat Nov 6 18:02:28 2010 (US/Eastern), in the function
> ext4_put_super() at line 719.  This is a new feature which was added
> in 2.6.36.
>    

This is going to be a faq...
I suppose the datetime is encoded (what format is that?) in that long 
number after "at".
May I suggest the datetime gets decoded in the printing?
Also may I suggest that the error happens immediately after mount and 
not after 300 seconds from mount?

I just subscribed to this list exactly to report the same kind of error.

Last week I was doing reliability tests for open-iscsi and this error 
drove me crazy. I spent days in tests where I thought I could reproduce 
an error in open-iscsi by disconnecting and reconnecting the network; I 
even reported this to the open-iscsi mailing list, but in fact it was an 
old error of the filesystem and it was not getting cleared by my older 
e2fsck 1.41.11 .

If that happened immediately after mount or if it spitted the datetime 
in human readable format, I would have immediately guessed it was due to 
an existing "filesystem problem" (even though I was running fsck.ext4 -f 
prior to each mount) but instead I thought it was due to my 5 minutes of 
"networks disconnection tests" I was doing after each mount. DOH!

Anyway thanks for your work: excellent filesystem.

PS: I have a question for you regarding ext4 behaviour with SCSI 
commands resubmissions... ok I am opening another thread for that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/