[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=0yNQkL3WSP-_GHTEwSb9KuBQmSxC006k-AxDe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 23:03:14 +0800
From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mike Christie <michaelc@...wisc.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v0] add nano semaphore in kernel
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:58 PM, Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 22:42 +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
>> > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 16:51:30 Daniel Walker wrote:
>> >> We for sure don't want new semaphores, or new semaphore usage in the
>> >> kernel ..
>>
>> Would you please, Daniel, explain why there are so my file systems under
>> the fs directory? Would you think the ext file system is better than others?
>>
>> And why there are in kernel spin lock, read/write lock, mutex, rw_mutex,
>> rtmutx, and semaphore, timer and hrtimer?
>>
>> Could timer be removed tonight?
>
> The problem with semaphores is that people use them in ways that are not
> very nice, and not very efficient.. Since they are so flexible they can
> be used in all sorts of ways, many of which are not clean. This is why,
> if you read the kernel history, most semaphore have been removed from
> the kernel and replaced with much nicer and cleaner mutexes.
>
> Daniel
Thanks for sharing the knowledge about rtmutx and semaphore.
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists