| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 07:10:31 -0600 From: Robin Holt <holt@....com> To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> Cc: Robin Holt <holt@....com>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/8] init: rename CONFIG_EMBEDDED to CONFIG_EXPERT On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 01:50:28PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 30 December 2010, Robin Holt wrote: > > Doesn't this patch series break the 'bisectable' rule for patches? > > I think you can get by with adding a CONFIG_EXPERT selects CONFIG_EMBEDDED > > in the first patch and the last patch removing that same selects. > > How about leaving it that way during the merge window even? That would > help people sending git pull requests that add new dependencies on > CONFIG_EMBEDDED. David can submit another patch that removes the > temporary CONFIG_EMBEDDED option along with any new users in -rc2 > or for 2.6.39 then. That would be fine with me, but I don't think my vote counts for much. I was just trying to help prevent the bisectability of your patchset. Robin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists