linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (netfilter build errors)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1293728845.7150.336.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Thu, 30 Dec 2010 18:07:25 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com>,
	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for December 29 (netfilter build errors)

Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 17:47 +0100, Sedat Dilek a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Changli Gao <xiaosuo@...il.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 13:07:00 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> Changes since 20101228:
> >>
> >>
> >> In file included from linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:22:
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:94: error: field 'ct_general' has incomplete type
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h: In function 'nf_ct_get':
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:174: error: 'const struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h: In function 'nf_ct_put':
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack.h:181: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_conntrack_put'
> >>  CC      net/ipv6/exthdrs_core.o
> >> In file included from linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h:18,
> >>                 from linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:26:
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h: In function 'nf_ct_ecache_ext_add':
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_ecache.h:35: error: 'struct net' has no member named 'ct'
> >> In file included from linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:26:
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h: In function 'nf_conntrack_confirm':
> >> linux-next-20101229/include/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.h:60: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c: In function 'nf_ct6_defrag_user':
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:36: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:37: error: implicit declaration of function 'nf_ct_zone'
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:37: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c: In function 'ipv6_defrag':
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:60: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> linux-next-20101229/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.c:60: error: 'struct sk_buff' has no member named 'nfct'
> >> make[4]: *** [net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_defrag_ipv6_hooks.o] Error 1
> >> make[3]: *** [net/ipv6/netfilter] Error 2
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > This bug has been already fixed in nf-next-2.6:
> > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/kaber/nf-next-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=ae90bdeaeac6b964b7a1e853a90a19f358a9ac20;hp=f1c722295e029eace7960fc687efd5afd67dc555
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Changli Gao(xiaosuo@...il.com)
> >
> 
> Does not look like the nf-next-2.6 is triggered by linux-next... Does
> this tree passes net-next-2.6 and then enters linux-next?
> 

Yes it does. Patrick is probably too busy right now to push fixes to
David.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/