[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D1BE615.4000700@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 17:53:25 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory
On 12/29/2010 05:07 PM, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Dec 2010, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>>> That's from f51bf3073a1 (x86, numa: Fake apicid and pxm mappings for NUMA
>>> emulation) and c1c3443c9c (x86, numa: Fake node-to-cpumask for NUMA
>>> emulation) in x86/numa. Given the subject line, I think your patchset is
>>> targeted to the same branch so I'm not sure what's concerning?
>>
>> No, it's part of a much bigger patchset which doesn't have anything to
>> do with NUMA. That's the problem.
>>
>> In other words, I need a sane way to merge them and resolve the conflict.
>
> The two patches above from x86/numa that create the conflict should be
> dependent only on 4e76f4e67a (x86, numa: Avoid compiling NUMA emulation
> functions without CONFIG_NUMA_EMU), so cherry-pick them into x86/bootmem?
That would hurt more, I think.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists