[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikknHfA4TQw+SMH-EyJBHoNHXk8Rheq4=K4jNWA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 16:11:40 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 3/6] x86, 64bit, numa: Put pgtable to local node memory
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 3:50 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/29/2010 03:46 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> -v2: update it to recent numa-emulation change
>>
>
> Lovely, yet another interbranch conflict. This makes me very concerned.
>
> What is the delta between these?
>
your new x86/numa have
setup_physnodes(addr, max_addr, acpi, amd);
fake_physnodes(acpi, amd, num_nodes);
instead of
acpi_fake_nodes(nodes, num_nodes);
in numa_emulation()
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists