[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201012301149.30888.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:49:30 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>,
Vishwanath BS <vishwanath.bs@...com>,
Partha Basak <p-basak2@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: i2c runtime suspend and system wide suspend
On Thursday, December 30, 2010, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:09 AM, Abhijeet Dharmapurikar
> <adharmap@...eaurora.org> wrote:
> > The i2c-core driver mixes runtime suspend and system wide suspend, in that,
> > during a system wide suspend, it skips calling ->suspend if the device is
> > runtime suspended.
> >
> > I have an interrupt controller running over the i2c bus and that driver is
> > oblivious of the runtime pm framework, IOW, it doesn't do any runtime pm
> > calls. CONFIG_RUNTIME_PM is enabled however (for some other bus drivers).
> > The issue I am facing is that all such i2c devices are assumed runtime
> > suspended and the ->suspend for these devices is not invoked during
> > systemwide suspend.
>
> This was discussed on linux-pm recently. Rafael had a fix, I'm don't know
> whether it's applied yet:
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029567.html
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029596.html
Yes, the fix is already in the Linus' tree:
f08f5a0 PM / Runtime: Fix pm_runtime_suspended()
> Also relevant:
>
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029600.html
> https://lists.linux-foundation.org/pipermail/linux-pm/2010-December/029658.html
I'm not sure what happened to the last patch. Is there a new version?
If so, is it going to be pushed through the i2c tree, or should I take it?
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists