[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101231130329.GA3610@shutemov.name>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:03:29 +0200
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kas@...nvz.org>
To: Rob Landley <rlandley@...allels.com>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kas@...nvz.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] make rpc_pipefs be mountable multiple time
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 06:52:43AM -0600, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 12/30/2010 05:45 AM, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > Currently, there is no association between rpc_pipefs and mount namespace,
>
> There is in that the root context doesn't need to have this mounted, and
> new namespaces do. So there's an existing association between a LACK of
> a namespace and a different default behavior.
>
> My understanding (correct me if I'm wrong) is that the historical
> behavior is that there's only one, and it doesn't actually live anywhere
> in the filesystem tree. You're adding a special location. I'm
> wondering if there's any way for that location not to be special.
/var/lib/net/rpc_pipefs is default path where userspace part of NFS stack
(gssd, idmapd) want to see rpc_pipefs
> > so I don't see simple way to restrict number of rpc_pipefs per mount
> > namespace. Associating mount namespace with rpc_pipefs is not a good idea,
> > I think.
>
> I'm talking about associating a default rpc_pipefs instance with a
> namespace, which it seems to me you're already doing by emulating the
> legacy behavior. Before you CLONE_NEWNS you get a magic default mount
> that doesn't exist in the tree. After you CLONE_NEWNS you get something
> like -EINVAL unless you supply your own default.
Root namespace is special. In case of nfsroot you need rpc_pipefs before
root available.
> (I'm actually not sure
> why new namespaces don't fall back to the magic global one...)
It breaks isolation. Container should not use host's rpc_pipefs without
host's permission.
> I'm suggesting that if the user doesn't specify -o rpcmount then the
> default could be the first rpc_pipefs mount visible to the current
> process context, rather than a specific path. Logic to do that exists
> in the proc/self/mounts code (which I'm reading through now...).
static int check_rpc_pipefs(struct vfsmount *mnt, void *arg)
{
struct vfsmount **rpcmount = arg;
struct path path = {
.mnt = mnt,
.dentry = mnt->mnt_root,
};
if (!mnt->mnt_sb)
return 0;
if (mnt->mnt_sb->s_magic != RPCAUTH_GSSMAGIC)
return 0;
if (!path_is_under(&path, ¤t->fs->root))
return 0;
*rpcmount = mntget(mnt);
return 1;
}
struct vfsmount *get_rpc_pipefs(const char *p)
{
int error;
struct vfsmount *rpcmount = ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
struct path path;
if (!p) {
iterate_mounts(check_rpc_pipefs, &rpcmount,
current->nsproxy->mnt_ns->root);
if (IS_ERR(rpcmount) && (current->nsproxy->mnt_ns ==
init_task.nsproxy->mnt_ns))
return mntget(init_rpc_pipefs);
return rpcmount;
}
error = kern_path(p, LOOKUP_FOLLOW | LOOKUP_DIRECTORY, &path);
if (error)
return ERR_PTR(error);
check_rpc_pipefs(path.mnt, &rpcmount);
path_put(&path);
return rpcmount;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_rpc_pipefs);
Something like this? Patch to replace patch #10 attached.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
View attachment "sunrpc-introduce-get_rpc_pipefs.patch" of type "text/plain" (2467 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists