linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with gspca/ov519 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 31 Dec 2010 14:40:47 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #25442] ixp4xx defines FREQ macro; conflicts with
 gspca/ov519 driver

On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:08 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> writes:
> 
> >> This FREQ has been there for years. Not that it makes it smart, and
> >> I'll obviously send Ben's patch upstream for 2.6.38. Still processing
> >> incoming mail queue :-(
> >
> > Well, the patch is in the mainline, which is why it's still listed.
> 
> s/is/isn't/ I assume.
> 
> I was referring to the "regression" thing only, i.e. there is no any
> regression here, AFAIK at least.

There is a regression for the ov519 driver on ixp4xx.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)