[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293809262.2870.45.camel@localhost>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 15:27:42 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: roel kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: eepro testing positive EBUSY return by
request_irq()?
On Fri, 2010-12-31 at 15:47 +0100, roel kluin wrote:
> Fix -EBUSY test for request_irq().
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/eepro.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> I just found this in the code, no bug was observed. Is this patch needed? the test
> for an -EBUSY return by request_irq() occurs much more frequently in kernel code.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/eepro.c b/drivers/net/eepro.c
> index 7c82631..47cfecb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/eepro.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/eepro.c
> @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int eepro_grab_irq(struct net_device *dev)
>
> eepro_sw2bank0(ioaddr); /* Switch back to Bank 0 */
>
> - if (request_irq (*irqp, NULL, IRQF_SHARED, "bogus", dev) != EBUSY) {
> + if (request_irq (*irqp, NULL, IRQF_SHARED, "bogus", dev) != -EBUSY) {
> unsigned long irq_mask;
> /* Twinkle the interrupt, and check if it's seen */
> irq_mask = probe_irq_on();
This condition is completely bogus - request_irq() with a NULL handler
now returns -EINVAL before even checking whether the IRQ is in use. The
code should be fixed along the lines of what I did for 3c503 in commit
b0cf4dfb7cd21556efd9a6a67edcba0840b4d98d.
The e2100 and hp net drivers have the same bug.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists