[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=GY+ZFNMCdCQAj7aL6smUmiJZ=a-kcc76EECj7@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 13:54:59 -0800
From: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@...mnit.ca>
To: yotam.medini@...il.com
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Yotam Medini <yotam.medini@...il.com> wrote:
> For a target ancient UMAX-ActionBook 530T, I am trying to compile
...
> The .config I ended up with does have:
> CONFIG_APM=m
> But no CONFIG_APM_POWER setting,
I don't think CONFIG_APM_POWER does what you think it does. I don't
know exactly what it does, either, but if you just want to use native
apm on your machine, you don't need it.
> When booting the kernel, I do not have /proc/apm.
Well, you compiled it as a module, so it's not surprising that it
wouldn't show up at boot time.
> I do get:
>
> $ sudo modprobe apm
> FATAL: Error inserting apm
> (/lib/modules/2.6.32.yumax/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/apm.ko): No such device
The output of 'dmesg' might be revealing here. However, it's likely
that your PC doesn't actually support APM unless it's *very* old. You
might want to try ACPI instead.
Hope this helps.
Avery
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists