[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20101230.162328.104050033.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 16:23:28 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: jeffm@...e.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, error27@...il.com,
balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] taskstats: Use better ifdef for alignment
From: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:12:08 -0500
> Commit 4be2c95d added a null field to align the taskstats structure but
> the discussion centered around ia64. The issue exists on other platforms
> with inefficient unaligned access and adding them piecemeal would be
> an unmaintainable mess.
>
> This patch uses Dave Miller's suggestion of using a combination of
> CONFIG_64BIT && !CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS to determine
> whether alignment is needed.
>
> Note that this will cause breakage on those platforms with applications
> like iotop which had hard-coded offsets into the packet to access the
> taskstats structure.
>
> The message seen on systems without the alignment fixes looks like:
> kernel unaligned access to 0xe000023879dca9bc, ip=0xa000000100133d10
>
> The addresses may vary but resolve to locations inside __delayacct_add_tsk.
>
> Reported-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists