[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20101231111712.GF18831@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:17:12 +0100
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jack Steiner <steiner@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:55:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c between commit
> d8850ba425d9823d3184bd52f065899dac4689f9 ("x86, UV: Fix the effect of
> extra bits in the hub nodeid register") from the tip tree and commit
> 0a3aee0da4402aa19b66e458038533c896fb80c6 ("x86: Use this_cpu_ops to
> optimize code") from the percpu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Thank you. Looks good to me.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists