[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110102085755.GA32469@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Sun, 2 Jan 2011 09:57:55 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent users from disabling tickless
Hi!
> Disabling NO_HZ has a serious negative effect on performance -- an extra
> 70us per I/O. Prevent users from deselecting it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...ux.intel.com>
System with fixed HZ is really simpler etc... and 70us per i/o does
not sound that bad.
Anyway, should not i/o overhead just be fixed?
Pavel
> diff --git a/kernel/time/Kconfig b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> index f06a8a3..55b9a04 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/Kconfig
> +++ b/kernel/time/Kconfig
> @@ -5,13 +5,9 @@ config TICK_ONESHOT
> bool
>
> config NO_HZ
> - bool "Tickless System (Dynamic Ticks)"
> + def_bool y
> depends on !ARCH_USES_GETTIMEOFFSET && GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS
> select TICK_ONESHOT
> - help
> - This option enables a tickless system: timer interrupts will
> - only trigger on an as-needed basis both when the system is
> - busy and when the system is idle.
>
> config HIGH_RES_TIMERS
> bool "High Resolution Timer Support"
>
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists