linux-kernel - Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during suspend/resume

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110102091142.GA32469@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date:	Sun, 2 Jan 2011 10:11:42 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Nigel Cunningham <lkml@...elcunningham.com.au>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch] x86: avoid unnecessary smp alternatives switch during
	suspend/resume

Hi!

> > We have a few others things that want to modify their behaviour
> > according to whether we're doing the atomic copy/restore. Perhaps it
> > would be an idea to just use a single flag, perhaps a value for
> > system_state?
> 
> I agree, it would be nicer if we don't introduce a special flag
> just for that. Other than that, I like all sane code that speeds up
> suspend/resume :). I've attached before/after dmesg excerpts on my
> system with the patch ontop of v2.6.37-rc2-181-gb86db47. We end up
> saving 11601 ??secs according to CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME but hey, the code is
> simple enough :).

11msec is not worth the uglyness of global variable like this. Should
we get a parameter, or something?

									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/