[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1293969476.29869.2.camel@wall-e>
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2011 12:57:56 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, shemminger@...tta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] new UDPCP Communication Protocol
Am Sonntag, den 02.01.2011, 12:33 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
> Le dimanche 02 janvier 2011 à 12:17 +0100, Stefani Seibold a écrit :
> > Am Samstag, den 01.01.2011, 23:23 +0100 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
>
> > > 3) I see UDPLITE references in your code. Are you sure UDPCP protocol
> > > can really work on top of UDPLITE ? I think not, so please remove dead
> > > code.
> > >
> >
> > I have not tested it yet. But i think i should work, the code is mostly
> > stolen from the udp.c file. Since the stack not depend on the len field
> > of the UDP header, it should not matter if UPD or UDP-Lite is used.
> >
>
> Hmm, but isnt your :
>
> udpcp_prot = udp_prot; /* in udpcp_init() */
>
> implies that all UDPCP sockets you are going to provide to user are on
> top of UDP, not UDPLITE ?
>
Okay, i kick to udplite support away!
> Also, could you provide a link to UDPCP protocol specs ?
>
http://read.pudn.com/downloads76/doc/project/283718/OBSAI/OBSAI/RP1_V2.0.PDF
> Thanks
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists