[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9ZNk6w8PxvveWHy5+okfTyKUj3L2ywFOuFjoq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 12:46:45 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: Should we be using unlikely() around tests of GFP_ZERO?
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu> wrote:
>
> Given the patches being busily submitted by trivial patch submitters to
> make use kmem_cache_zalloc(), et. al, I believe we should remove the
> unlikely() tests around the (gfp_flags & __GFP_ZERO) tests, such as:
>
> - if (unlikely((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && objp))
> + if ((flags & __GFP_ZERO) && objp)
> memset(objp, 0, obj_size(cachep));
>
> Agreed? If so, I'll send a patch...
I support it.
Recently Steven tried to gather the information.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1072767
Maybe he might have a number for that.
>
> - Ted
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@...ck.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom policy in Canada: sign http://dissolvethecrtc.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists