[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4d220593.2308e30a.48c5.ffff8ae9@mx.google.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 18:20:01 +0200
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...e.hu, paulus@...ba.org,
davem@...emloft.net, fweisbec@...il.com,
perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net, eranian@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
robert.richter@....com, acme@...hat.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] perf_events: generalize use of event_filter_match() (v7)
Replace all occurrences of:
event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu == smp_processor_id()
by a call to:
event_filter_match(event)
This makes the code more consistent and will make the cgroup
patch smaller.
Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
---
diff --git a/kernel/perf_event.c b/kernel/perf_event.c
index 2c14e3a..dcdb19e 100644
--- a/kernel/perf_event.c
+++ b/kernel/perf_event.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static void __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
goto unlock;
/*
@@ -1094,7 +1094,7 @@ static void __perf_event_enable(void *info)
goto unlock;
__perf_event_mark_enabled(event, ctx);
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
goto unlock;
/*
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ ctx_pinned_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->pinned_groups, group_entry) {
if (event->state <= PERF_EVENT_STATE_OFF)
continue;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, 1))
@@ -1473,7 +1473,7 @@ ctx_flexible_sched_in(struct perf_event_context *ctx,
* Listen to the 'cpu' scheduling filter constraint
* of events:
*/
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
if (group_can_go_on(event, cpuctx, can_add_hw)) {
@@ -1700,7 +1700,7 @@ static void perf_ctx_adjust_freq(struct perf_event_context *ctx, u64 period)
if (event->state != PERF_EVENT_STATE_ACTIVE)
continue;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
continue;
hwc = &event->hw;
@@ -3899,7 +3899,7 @@ static int perf_event_task_match(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if (event->attr.comm || event->attr.mmap ||
@@ -4036,7 +4036,7 @@ static int perf_event_comm_match(struct perf_event *event)
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if (event->attr.comm)
@@ -4184,7 +4184,7 @@ static int perf_event_mmap_match(struct perf_event *event,
if (event->state < PERF_EVENT_STATE_INACTIVE)
return 0;
- if (event->cpu != -1 && event->cpu != smp_processor_id())
+ if (!event_filter_match(event))
return 0;
if ((!executable && event->attr.mmap_data) ||
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists