[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104083733.GA4563@riccoc20.at.omicron.at>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 09:37:33 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: "Kuwahara,T." <6vvetjsrt26xsrzlh1z0zn4d2grdah@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Richard Cochran <richard.cochran@...cron.at>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ntp: add ADJ_SETOFFSET mode bit
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:44:26PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 05:47 +0900, Kuwahara,T. wrote:
> > I came up with this simple solution: "Just use ADJ_OFFSET as usual,
> > but don't forget to disable the kernel PLL."
>
> Again, this seems to be trying to add new functionality into a corner
> case of a existing mode.
>
> I don't like this because it makes testing and validating that the code
> is correct for its uses difficult. Especially given that a number of
> combinations of modes might be set at once. What happens to freq
> adjustments done at the same time as an ADJ_OFFSET - STA_PLL?
Where are the mode bits and their combinations documented, anyhow?
There are lot of papers on NTP, and I have not read them all, but I
don't recall having seen a precise and succinct decription of the
ntp_adjtime interface anywhere.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists