[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104092541.GC2760@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 04:25:41 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 8/8] fs: add i_op->sync_inode
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:31:32PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> And actually I think it is much better to have sync_inode, which means
> we'll be able to get rid of commit_metadata (which should be an inode
> operation anyway, not an export operation which really should deal with
> exporting filesystems to a non-vfs namespace, not nfsd hacks).
>
> commit_metadata would just be sync_inode with a null range or no data
> sync flag set.
As explained in the previous mail it's not just not writing data, it's
conceptually quite different from fsync.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists