[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294136267.2016.105.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:17:47 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add __rcu annotation
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 16:06 +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Add __rcu annotation to :
> (struct rq)->sd
That's a broken changelog, it's about as good as:
i++; /* increment i */
I'm really starting to detest sparse (lock annotations), it keeps adding
these annotations, but does it ever catch an actual bug?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists