[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294137134.4379.9.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:32:14 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 0/3] directed yield for Pause Loop Exiting
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 11:09 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 01/04/2011 08:42 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > If I were to, say, run a 256 CPU VM on my quad, would this help me get
> > more hackbench or whatever oomph from my (256X80386/20:) box?
>
> First of all, you can't run 256 guests on x86 kvm.
I didn't want 256 guests. Just one great big dog slow virtual playpen :)
> > > Both Intel and AMD CPUs have a feature that detects when a virtual
> > > CPU is spinning on a lock and will trap to the host.
> >
> > Does an Intel Q6600 have this trap gizmo (iow will this do anything at
> > all for my little box if I were to try it out).
>
> Likely not. Run
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/qemu-kvm.git;a=blob_plain;f=kvm/scripts/vmxcap;hb=HEAD,
> look for 'PAUSE-loop exiting'. I think the first processors to include
> them were the Nehalem-EXs, and Westmeres have them as well.
Oh darn, need new box to get all the toys. Thanks.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists