[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294138884.2016.106.camel@laptop>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2011 12:01:24 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] sched: add __rcu annotation
On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 11:55 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mardi 04 janvier 2011 à 11:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra a écrit :
>
> > I'm really starting to detest sparse (lock annotations), it keeps adding
> > these annotations, but does it ever catch an actual bug?
>
> Actually I caught at least one bug in networking (FIB code ?) thanks to
> these __rcu annotations ;)
>
> Cannot remember the exact bug, sorry ;)
Ah, ok.. then they're not completely pointless. Lai, can you resend with
a slightly better changelog?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists