[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTimFTzHjLy1zSURiOdcDJUSa9b-ZU1kxL_qK+7-T@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 12:56:05 +0100
From: Yegor Yefremov <yegorslists@...glemail.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc: rpurdie@...ys.net, lenz@...wisc.edu,
kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, arminlitzel@....de,
Cyril Hrubis <metan@....cz>, thommycheck@...il.com,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
dbaryshkov@...il.com, omegamoon@...il.com, eric.y.miao@...il.com,
utx@...guin.cz, zaurus-devel@...ts.linuxtogo.org,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>, gregkh@...e.de
Subject: Re: zaurus bluetooth regression
>> >> It seems this commit
>> >>
>> >> commit 7a56aa45982bb87bfca98a2832b5ae782c03364a
>> > ...
>> >> ...is responsible for my bluetooth problems on zaurus -- at least
>> >> bisect pointed to it, as I use 16C950-based bluetooth card, it seems
>> >> very logical. I'll try 2.6.37-rc8 with that patch reverted...
>> >>
>> >
>> > And yes, 37-rc8 with that reverted results in working bluetooth, so
>> > yrs, that patch is responsible.
>>
>> could you tell, what kind of problem you're encountering and if you
>> could tell, which flag UART_CAP_EFR or UART_CAP_SLEEP causes the
>> problem?
>
> Bluetooth will not work with 'tx command timeout', details should be
> in bugzilla.
>
> CAP_EFR seems to cause the problem.
Aside from sleep functions the only impact CAP_EFR makes is enabling
automatic CTS flow control. Below the cite from 16C950 data sheet:
"EFR[7]: Enable automatic CTS flow control.
logic 0 ⇒ CTS flow control is disabled (default).
logic 1 ⇒ CTS flow control is enabled in Enhanced mode
(i.e. EFR[4] = 1), where the data transmission is
prevented whenever the CTS# pin is held
inactive high. 650 and 950-mode drivers should
use this bit to enable CTS flow control. 750
mode drivers should use MCR[5].
When automatic CTS flow control is enabled and the CTS#
input becomes active, the UART will disable transmission
as soon as any current character transmission is complete.
Transmission is resumed whenever the CTS# input
becomes inactive. "
I've tested with such an UART and transmitted some chunk of data with
and without RTS/CTS flow control enabled at 460800 b/s. The test
showed that in enabled state all data was transmitted correctly.
Without RTS/CTS flow control enabled there was massive data loss, as
expected. So the flow control function seems to work correctly.
Regards,
Yegor
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists