linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 13:44:35 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Cc:	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lrg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] regulator MAX8998/LP3974: Support DVS-GPIO.

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 05:16:56PM +0900, MyungJoo Ham wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com> wrote:

> > Is it desirable to define all four for BUCK1 and two for BUCK2 DVS
> > voltages in platform code?

> In case a system with 4 buck1 preset voltages and 2 buck2 preset
> voltages, it is desirable. :)

I suspect Lukasz's question is more why this would be useful; I can
imagine that the main reason would be performance and in any case I
don't see it hurting to have the option.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/