Since we can now call select_task_rq() and set_task_cpu() with only p->pi_lock held, and sched_exec() load-balancing has always been optimistic, drop all rq->lock usage. Oleg also noted that need_migrate_task() will always be true for current, so don't bother calling that at all. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra --- kernel/sched.c | 15 +++++---------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched.c +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched.c @@ -3412,27 +3412,22 @@ void sched_exec(void) { struct task_struct *p = current; unsigned long flags; - struct rq *rq; int dest_cpu; - rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags); + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&p->pi_lock, flags); dest_cpu = p->sched_class->select_task_rq(p, SD_BALANCE_EXEC, 0); if (dest_cpu == smp_processor_id()) goto unlock; - /* - * select_task_rq() can race against ->cpus_allowed - */ - if (cpumask_test_cpu(dest_cpu, &p->cpus_allowed) && - likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu)) && need_migrate_task(p)) { + if (likely(cpu_active(dest_cpu))) { struct migration_arg arg = { p, dest_cpu }; - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); - stop_one_cpu(cpu_of(rq), migration_cpu_stop, &arg); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); + stop_one_cpu(task_cpu(p), migration_cpu_stop, &arg); return; } unlock: - task_rq_unlock(rq, &flags); + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&p->pi_lock, flags); } #endif -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/