[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104151656.GA339@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:16:56 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...sony.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/18] sched: Reduce runqueue lock contention -v4
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> Latest version of the scary patches...
Just to make it easier for others to see the rationale behind this series, see the
numbers and limitations listed below.
Ingo
------------------------->
As measured using: http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/sembench.c
$ echo 4096 32000 64 128 > /proc/sys/kernel/sem
$ ./sembench -t 2048 -w 1900 -o 0
unpatched: run time 30 seconds 639476 worker burns per second
patched: run time 30 seconds 847526 worker burns per second
Still need to sort out all the races marked XXX (non-trivial), and its
x86 only for the moment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists