[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104164737.GB4739@erda.amd.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:47:37 +0100
From: Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>
CC: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"fweisbec@...il.com" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net" <perfmon2-devel@...ts.sf.net>,
"eranian@...il.com" <eranian@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf_event.h header usage
On 04.01.11 10:44:39, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:30:01PM +0200, Stephane Eranian escreveu:
> > This patch fixes the usage of the perf_event.h header file
> > between command modules and the supporting code in util.
> >
> > It is necessary to ensure that ALL files use the SAME
> > perf_event.h header from the kernel source tree.
> >
> > There were a couple of #include <linux/perf_event.h> mixed
> > with #include "../../perf_event.h".
> >
> > This caused issues on some distros because of mismatch
> > in the layout of struct perf_event_attr. That eventually
> > led perf stat to segfault.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
>
> Thanks, applying.
Isn't this valid for all <linux/*.h> header files?
-Robert
--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists