[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTim38-vyKzKg8UDzffX2jWAJrgQNJZd=rd7gbpCc@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 17:59:01 +0100
From: MichaĆ Nazarewicz <mina86@...a86.com>
To: Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...eaurora.org>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Ankita Garg <ankita@...ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/12] Contiguous Memory Allocator
> Russell King wrote:
>> Has anyone addressed my issue with it that this is wide-open for
>> abuse by allocating large chunks of memory, and then remapping
>> them in some way with different attributes, thereby violating the
>> ARM architecture specification?
2011/1/4 Johan MOSSBERG <johan.xx.mossberg@...ricsson.com>:
> Where in the specification (preferably ARMv7) can I find
> information about this? Is the problem that it is simply
> forbidden to map an address multiple times with different cache
> setting and if this is done the hardware might start failing? Or
> is the problem that having an address mapped cached means that
> speculative pre-fetch can read it into the cache at any time,
> possibly causing problems if an un-cached mapping exists?
IIRC both apply.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists