linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110104051314.GA6748@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:13:14 +0100
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree

Hello, Stephen.

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c: In function 'intel_thermal_interrupt':
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:368: error: implicit declaration of function 'this_cpu_has'
> 
> Caused by commit 6ac0bb7148b93fb40bccba5dff06d51a3e3ea283 ("x86: use
> this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt").
> 
> this_cpu_has() does not exist anywhere except in this introduced usage.
> 
> I have used the percpu tree from next-20101231 for today.

My apologies.  I forgot an earlier patch to introduce this_cpu_has()
macro.  I've reverted the offending commit.

Thank you.

--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/