[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110104055230.GA3402@amd>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 16:52:30 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@...nel.dk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Venkateswararao Jujjuri <jvrao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-scale tree with the v9fs
tree
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 12:40:54PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-scale tree got a conflict in
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c between commit 3d21652a1d23591e7f0bbbbedae29ce78c2c1113
> ("fs/9p: Move dotl inode operations into a seperate file") from the v9fs
> tree and various commits from the vfs-scale tree.
>
> I fixed it up by using the v9fs changes to that file and then applying
> the following merge fixup patch (which I can carry as necessary).
Thanks Stephen.
> Someone will need to fix this up before one of these trees is merged by
> Linus, or to send this merge fix to Linus.
If Linus does pull vfs-scale, and if it is before the v9fs tree, I can
help with the conversion. Otherwise I will be happy to fix up fallout
in my tree.
Thanks,
Nick
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists