[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101050928.53979.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:28:53 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations
On Wednesday, January 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:07:37PM -0800, Abhijeet Dharmapurikar wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
>
> >> device op. The PM core provides pm_generic_ functions implementing this
> >> behaviour - use them to reduce coupling with future PM updates.
>
> > pm_generic_suspend() and others needs to be externed in linux/pm_runtime.h?
>
> Yes, there's a patch in -next for this already so this patch would need
> to either wait for later in the merge window or go in via the PM tree
> with the preceeding one (the original version of this patch was posted
> as part of a series with the export patch).
I would take it, but I'm still waiting for a word from Jean.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists