linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 5 Jan 2011 09:28:53 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@...eaurora.org>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Rabin Vincent <rabin@....in>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: Factor out runtime suspend checks from PM operations

On Wednesday, January 05, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:07:37PM -0800, Abhijeet Dharmapurikar wrote:
> > Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> >> device op. The PM core provides pm_generic_ functions implementing this
> >> behaviour - use them to reduce coupling with future PM updates.
> 
> > pm_generic_suspend() and others needs to be externed in linux/pm_runtime.h?
> 
> Yes, there's a patch in -next for this already so this patch would need
> to either wait for later in the merge window or go in via the PM tree
> with the preceeding one (the original version of this patch was posted
> as part of a series with the export patch).

I would take it, but I'm still waiting for a word from Jean.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/