[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D24431F.2030205@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 18:08:31 +0800
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] KVM: make make_all_cpus_request() lockless
On 01/05/2011 05:54 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> + kvm_make_request(req, vcpu);
>> cpu = vcpu->cpu;
>> if (cpus != NULL&& cpu != -1&& cpu != me&&
>> atomic_read(&vcpu->guest_mode))
>> @@ -163,7 +161,7 @@ static bool make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
>> smp_call_function_many(cpus, ack_flush, NULL, 1);
>> else
>> called = false;
>> - raw_spin_unlock(&kvm->requests_lock);
>> + put_cpu();
>> free_cpumask_var(cpus);
>> return called;
>> }
>
> Maybe we can drop 'cpu != me' and then we don't need to disable preemption?
>
Preemption should be disabled in the caller site of smp_call_function_many():
......
* You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
* hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler. Preemption
* must be disabled when calling this function.
*/
void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
smp_call_func_t func, void *info, bool wait)
{
......
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists