[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110105112313.GA18546@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 12:23:13 +0100
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>, mingo@...e.hu,
trenn@...e.de, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf: add calls to suspend trace point
Hi!
> > >> I am in favor of 3) of 4).
> > >> What do you think?
> > >
> > > Why don't we keep the tracepoints as proposed _and_ add two additional
> > > tracepoints around device suspend-resume?
> > I like the idea but that requires to extend the current API with
> > additional suspend tracepoints or device state change tracepoints.
> > That can be done once the current API is firmly in place.
> > Today the only trace API for suspend is machine_suspend(unsigned int
> > state), so I think the best option is 3) here above.
> >
> > Unless there is an objection I am pushing 3) asap.
>
> Fine by me.
Why not...
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists