[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110105191424.GA7820@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 20:14:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>, peterz@...radead.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, tglx@...utronix.de,
andi@...stfloor.org, roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
avi@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, sam@...nborg.org,
michael@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: introduce static_branch()
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 01/05/2011 09:43 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >
> >> This patch will conflict with the MIPS jump label support that Ralf has
> >> queued up for 2.6.38.
> >
> > Can you disable that support for now? As Linus said at Kernel Summit,
> > other archs jumped too quickly onto the jump label band wagon. This
> > change really needs to get in, and IMO, it is more critical to clean up
> > the jump label code than to have other archs implementing it.
> >
>
> Ralf is really good... perhaps we can get the conflicts resolved?
Yep, the best Git-ish way to handle that is to resolve the conflicts whenever they
happen - i.e. whoever merges his tree upstream later. No need for anyone to 'wait'
or undo anything.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists