[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294257893.26623.116.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:04:53 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: ddaney@...iumnetworks.com, jbaron@...hat.com, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
peterz@...radead.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, hpa@...or.com,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, andi@...stfloor.org,
roland@...hat.com, rth@...hat.com, masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, avi@...hat.com, sam@...nborg.org,
michael@...erman.id.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] jump label: introduce static_branch()
On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 10:44 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:43:59 -0500
>
> > On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 09:32 -0800, David Daney wrote:
> >
> >> This patch will conflict with the MIPS jump label support that Ralf has
> >> queued up for 2.6.38.
> >
> > Can you disable that support for now? As Linus said at Kernel Summit,
> > other archs jumped too quickly onto the jump label band wagon.
>
> I totally disagree with this assesment. Implementing jump label for
> sparc64 as early as possible found so much broken stuff that otherwise
> would have merged in before any other architecture tried supporting
> it.
The issue here is that jump labels went in too fast. And I agree that
having it ported to all archs is/was important. But the infrastructure
needs to be cleaned up.
Probably best to get out the kinks in Linux next as suppose to mainline.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists