[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110105233535.GB8846@yookeroo>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 10:35:35 +1100
From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To: "Blanchard, Hollis" <Hollis_Blanchard@...tor.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"Saxena, Deepak" <deepak_saxena@...tor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/device: Don't register disabled devices
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 02:53:27PM -0800, Blanchard, Hollis wrote:
> On 01/03/2011 03:01 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> > Device nodes with the property status="disabled" are not usable and so
> > don't register them when parsing the device tree for devices.
> >
> This is great and all, but a fair amount of driver code explicitly
> searches the tree, rather than registering a probe function. That's why
> our earlier patches in this area were more comprehensive.
>
> What are your thoughts on handling those cases?
One by one. Trying to handle the explicit searches automagically is
just asking for trouble.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists