linux-kernel - [11/49] NFS: Fix fcntl F_GETLK not reporting some conflicts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Jan 2011 15:00:29 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Cc:	stable-review@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Sergey Vlasov <vsu@...linux.ru>,
	Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Subject: [11/49] NFS: Fix fcntl F_GETLK not reporting some conflicts

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@...linux.ru>

commit 21ac19d484a8ffb66f64487846c8d53afef04d2b upstream.

The commit 129a84de2347002f09721cda3155ccfd19fade40 (locks: fix F_GETLK
regression (failure to find conflicts)) fixed the posix_test_lock()
function by itself, however, its usage in NFS changed by the commit
9d6a8c5c213e34c475e72b245a8eb709258e968c (locks: give posix_test_lock
same interface as ->lock) remained broken - subsequent NFS-specific
locking code received F_UNLCK instead of the user-specified lock type.
To fix the problem, fl->fl_type needs to be saved before the
posix_test_lock() call and restored if no local conflicts were reported.

Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23892
Tested-by: Alexander Morozov <amorozov@...rsoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <vsu@...linux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>

---
 fs/nfs/file.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -680,6 +680,7 @@ static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, i
 {
 	struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
 	int status = 0;
+	unsigned int saved_type = fl->fl_type;
 
 	/* Try local locking first */
 	posix_test_lock(filp, fl);
@@ -687,6 +688,7 @@ static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, i
 		/* found a conflict */
 		goto out;
 	}
+	fl->fl_type = saved_type;
 
 	if (nfs_have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ))
 		goto out_noconflict;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/