[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110105045447.GN23414@ksplice.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 23:54:47 -0500
From: Nelson Elhage <nelhage@...lice.com>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: cgroup scheduling: Adding kthreadd to a non-RT cgroup can deadlock
the kernel
Hi,
I've found a bug where, on CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED systems, adding the kthreadd
task to a cgroup with cpu.rt_runtime_us = 0 (as some cgroup configuration
scripts do, when they move all processes into a default cgroup), can result in
deadlocks in the kernel.
On 2.6.37, the problem can be triggered via CPU hotplug. The following sequence
of events will deadlock on an SMP system:
1. Add kthreadd to a cpu cgroup with rt_runtime_us = 0
2. echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
3. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
4. echo 0 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
5. echo 1 > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu1/online
In line (3), the CPU hotplug will cause us to create a new ksoftirqd/1
thread. Since that thread is forked from kthreadd, it will end up in the same
cgroup, also without any realtime access.
In step (4), cpu_callback in softirq.c will attempt to kill ksoftirqd by setting
it to SCHED_FIFO and using kthread_stop(). It does this with
'sched_setscheduler_nocheck', which bypasses the usual checks that prevent
setting a process to an SCHED_FIFO if it is in a cgroup that would prevent it
from running.
Thus, ksoftirqd ends up at SCHED_FIFO but with a zero rt_runtime_us, and is
never scheduled again, and kthread_stop blocks waiting on it.
In (5), we try to call the CPU notifier chain again, but it is still locked from
(4), and we deadlock.
For reasons I don't fully understand, just adding ksoftirqd/1 to a cgroup and
then taking CPU 1 offline doesn't result in a hang, so I think there may be some
detail of this situation I don't fully understand, but I'm pretty confident in
the general analysis.
Before 2.6.34, we can trigger a similar problem just by adding kthreadd to a
cgroup and then calling stop_machine (e.g. by removing a module), since
stop_machine created a new RT workqueue on each invocation. This is how I first
found this problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/693594
- Nelson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists