linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector generic implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110106093940.GA31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:39:40 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso@...com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	"vapier@...too.org" <vapier@...too.org>,
	"nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Filippo ARCIDIACONO <filippo.arcidiacono@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector
	generic implementation

On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 12:59:18PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Is someone interested into this stuff ?

Looking at the CC list, you're asking the people who already have the
support in the kernel.  I suspect they don't have that much of an
interest in it.

Maybe you should try asking other architecture maintainers who don't
support this yet?  Not every architecture maintainer is subscribed to,
or reads LKML...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/