linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector generic implementation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110106141946.GE31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:19:46 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Carmelo AMOROSO <carmelo.amoroso@...com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nicolas.pitre@...aro.org" <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	"vapier@...too.org" <vapier@...too.org>,
	"nico@...xnic.net" <nico@...xnic.net>,
	"linux-sh@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Filippo ARCIDIACONO <filippo.arcidiacono@...com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector
	generic implementation

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
> Well, SH (in CC) does not have this support. Indeed we posted it
> initially to linux-sh only. We got useful feedback from Paul, Mike and
> Nicolas suggesting to promote the ARM/SH solution based on the global
> __stack_chk_guard variable as a generic solution for all other
> architectures. This is why I thought to post to the LKML instead of each
> linux-<arch> list.

Have you thought about posting it to _the_ linux-arch list?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/