[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4D25F79F020000780002AC20@vpn.id2.novell.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 16:10:55 +0000
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...ell.com>
To: "Frederic Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Stephane Eranian" <eranian@...gle.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>,
"Soeren Sandmann Pedersen" <sandmann@...hat.com>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] x86: Fix rbp saving in pt_regs on irq
entry
>>> On 06.01.11 at 16:45, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com> wrote:
> Before we had:
>
>
> leaveq
>
> CFI_RESTORE rbp
> CFI_DEF_CFA_REGISTER rsp
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET -8
>
> So CFI_RESTORE means rbp has now the value of the base frame of
> the calling frame (the base frame pointer of the interrupted proc) ?
No - all it means is that %rbp now has its original (caller or
interrupted procedure) value again (i.e. an unwinder should not
try to read it from the stack [or other previously recorded
location] anymore).
> And what follows means that rsp-8 points to the return address?
No - .cfi_def_cfa_register says which register serves as the frame
pointer, and .cfi_adjust_cfa_offset says to adjust the offset from
the frame pointer to the top [or bottom] of frame. At any time
CFA = cfa_register + cfa_offset
with CFA being what all locations on the stack are expressed
relative to.
Jan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists