[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110106172922.GA29580@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:29:22 -0800
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Ben Skeggs <skeggsb@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/32] drm/nouveau: use system_wq instead of
dev_priv->wq
Hello,
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:16:05AM +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-05 at 11:07 +1000, Ben Skeggs wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 14:49 +0100, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > With cmwq, there's no reason for nouveau to use a dedicated workqueue.
> > > Drop dev_priv->wq and use system_wq instead.
> > >
> > > Because nouveau_irq_uninstall() may be called from unsleepable
> > > context, the work items can't be flushed from there. Instead, init
> > > and flush from nouveau_load/unload().
> > Ehh, ok, why not! I'll push this through the nouveau tree, and it'll
> > get to Dave from there.
>
> On second thoughts, this won't apply on top of current nouveau code
> that's queued for 2.6.38. Can you rebase on top of Dave's drm-next tree
> please.
We already missed this merge window, so I'll refresh the patch once
the window is closed and resend.
Thank you.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists