linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4D260812.3010605@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Jan 2011 12:21:06 -0600
From:	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
CC:	Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net>,
	Brad Parker <brad@...ltoe.com>, Anand Gadiyar <gadiyar@...com>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
	Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@...com>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the omap tree

Kevin Hilman had written, on 01/06/2011 12:15 PM, the following:
> Koen Kooi <koen@...inion.thruhere.net> writes:
> 
>> Op 6 jan 2011, om 16:43 heeft Brad Parker het volgende geschreven:
>>
>>> It's probably expected, but I can't get the EHCI USB port  to work
>>> on a beagle board XM (36xx) using the current omap tree.
>>>
>>> It this most likely due to these clock issues?
>> You need this patch: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/47807/
>>
>> I'm currently too lazy to split it up like Nishant wants as I don't
>> see the point splitting for the sake of splitting.--
> 
> IMO, it doesn't need to be split up.
> 
> But it does have to fix the other comments I made on the same thread[1]
> 
> 1) add a descriptive changelog, and
> 2) Cc linux-arm-kernel

Kevin,
there are four things being done in the patch:
a) fix GPIO number for EHCI power on
b) fix GPIO number for DVI reset line
c) switch on DVI
d) switch on Camera

I have split the first 2 up. I just splitting the (c) up when I noticed 
the code is confusing - I will reply in thread to the original patch.

I apologize, but I disagree - as far as I see it, these are separate 
changes being done.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon

View attachment "0001-omap3-beaglexm-fix-EHCI-power-up-GPIO-dir.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1541 bytes)

View attachment "0002-omap3-beaglexm-fix-DVI-reset-GPIO.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1497 bytes)