lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D260A96.4020400@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:31:50 +0100
From:	Marco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@...il.com>
To:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
CC:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux FS Devel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Embedded <linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] pramfs: persistent and protected RAM filesystem

Il 06/01/2011 19:22, Luck, Tony ha scritto:
>> Errata corrige: maybe I used the wrong term, I meant "volatile" instead
>> of "temporary" information, i.e. I'd like to save this info to re-read
>> it later but I don't want to store it in flash, a simple log, run-time
>> information for debug like a flight-recorder or whatever you want.
> 
> I'm puzzled by the use of "a generic piece of memory" to store "persistent"
> things (Perhaps this is made clear in the 17 parts of the patch? I haven't
> read them yet).  On x86 f/w typically clears all of memory on reset ... so
> you only get persistence if you use kexec to get from the old kernel to
> the new one.
> 
> -Tony
> 

First of all, you can find a lot of information on the web site where
there is an overview and a page with implementation details, benchmark
and so on. With "a generic piece of memory" I mean a generic memory
device directly addressable. Usually this generic device is an NVRAM, so
we have a persistent store. If you haven't got this hw you can use other
devices or the classic RAM, in this case you have a fs persistent only
over reboot. The use of this fs is mainly for embedded systems, fw can
be configured to not clear *all* the memory. Pramfs is indeed supported
by U-Boot, you can see CONFIG_PRAM in the Das U-Boot manual. x86 in this
case can be a "strange" world for this fs, but however if the user wants
it can be used without problems because there aren't neither strict arch
or hw dependency.

Marco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ