| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <m37hehloon.fsf@intrepid.localdomain> Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2011 22:14:48 +0100 From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] checkpatch: putting the && or || on the wrong line Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes: >> >> Sure, standardization is a good thing - to a certain point. >> >> We've passed this point long ago. > Right. It's all exactly the same. > We agree. Cites aren't necessary. People complained on lkml and other lists that the CodingStyle / checkpatch went way too far many times. So the evidence is there, in the list archives, and I guess even now you're getting feedback on this. OTOH you failed to show evidence that super-strict standardization benefits anyone. -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists