lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1294389025.2704.95.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date:	Fri, 07 Jan 2011 09:30:25 +0100
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	stable@...nel.org, stable-review@...nel.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [058/152] tcp: protect sysctl_tcp_cookie_size reads

Le jeudi 06 janvier 2011 à 23:08 -0500, William Allen Simpson a écrit :
> Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  There's been quite a few
> changes in the 18 months since this function was originally written.
> 
> The overall purpose of the patch seems OK, although most of the patch
> has nothing to do with the purported fix.
> 
> That is, somebody preferred to alter conditions and remove braces.  Seems
> harder to read to me!  I'm surprised that this passed checkpatch.pl?
> 

Hi William, here is somebody talking to you.

This part of the code was exactly what you wrote, with no change.

http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/40126/

Are you telling us somebody else added bug to your code ?
This is not the case, obviously.

After bug fix and cleanup code looks good, and even checkpatch.pl is
fine with it. No need for useless brackets around "return XXX;"
If I remember well, I did the cleanup so that my patch could not trigger
checkpatch.pl errors/warnings. Not that I am a particular checkpatch
fan, but I know some people are.

By the way, you were CCed when I sent one month ago the mail to
David/netdev. And no reaction from you at that time.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ