[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87vd21kr0d.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 14:52:10 +0530
From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Mem leak in btrfs_get_acl()
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:45:21 +0100 (CET), Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net> wrote:
>
> It seems to me that we leak the memory allocated to 'value' in
> btrfs_get_acl() if the call to posix_acl_from_xattr() fails.
> Here's a patch that attempts to correct that problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
I posted a similar patch long time back. But never got picked up
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/6164
Message-id:"1279547924-25141-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com"
> ---
> acl.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> compile tested only.
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> index 2222d16..6d1410e 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c
> @@ -60,8 +60,10 @@ static struct posix_acl *btrfs_get_acl(struct inode *inode, int type)
> size = __btrfs_getxattr(inode, name, value, size);
> if (size > 0) {
> acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(value, size);
> - if (IS_ERR(acl))
> + if (IS_ERR(acl)) {
> + kfree(value);
> return acl;
> + }
> set_cached_acl(inode, type, acl);
> }
> kfree(value);
>
>
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists