linux-kernel - Re: Signal patchset

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AANLkTik-9r_ZPkzVGowW2xT8h+QtVJ57q3mE6iKsuuVa@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:17:13 +0100
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Schwab <schwab@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Signal patchset

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 21:42, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 14:23, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com> wrote:
>> On 15/12/10 20:10, Al Viro wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 12:15:10PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>>>
>>>> Unless someone objects, I'm inclined to apply Al's patchset, as it
>>>> improves the
>>>> situation anyway.
>>>>
>>>> OK?
>>>
>>> FWIW, there's an m68knommu counterpart (ACKed by gerg a while ago).  The
>>> entire bunch is on ftp.linux.org.uk/pub/people/viro/m68k-signals - both m68k
>>> and m68knommu sets.  I don't know how you guys would prefer it done, since
>
> Thx, good the know the nommu part is there, as I don't seem to have it
> in my mailbox.
>
>>> there's a trivial dependency between m68k and m68knommu parts of series -
>>> the former has
>>> +#ifndef __uClinux__
>>> +#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
>>> +#endif
>>> in unistd.h and the latter does
>>> -#ifndef __uClinux__
>>>  #define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND
>>> -#endif
>>> Both parts switch to generic sys_rt_sigsuspend(), for mmu and nommu resp.,
>>> so they need __ARCH_WANT_SYS_RT_SIGSUSPEND defined as soon as conversion
>>> is done.  Other than that they are independent.
>>
>> I can make sure to send to Linus after Geert. Unless Geert you
>> want to take and send both the m68k and m68knommu changes?
>
> I can take the m68knommu changes with your ack, too.
> I'll try to take a look at it tomorrow...

I applied the m68k part to master and for-2.6.38/for-linus.
In addition, I applied the m68knommu part with Greg's acks added to for-next.

Greg, please let me know if this is OK, so I can send a pull request to Linus
after it's been cooking one night in linux-next.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/