[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201101070116.57654.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 01:16:57 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Guan Xuetao" <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>,
Al Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 11/12] unicore32 core architecture: signals
On Saturday 25 December 2010, Guan Xuetao wrote:
> From: Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
>
> Patch 11 implements signals.
>
> Signed-off-by: Guan Xuetao <guanxuetao@...c.pku.edu.cn>
> ---
> arch/unicore32/include/asm/sigcontext.h | 61 ++++
> arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.c | 571 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> arch/unicore32/kernel/signal.h | 16 +
> 3 files changed, 648 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
Al Viro recently did a major cleanup of the signal handling code in a
number of architectures. He can probably give much better feedback
on this one than I can.
The one thing that sticks out to me is that you implement both legacy
and rt signals, where new architectures should generally only need the
rt variant.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists